tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7315236707728759521.post3850534856079868925..comments2024-03-28T21:52:52.100-06:00Comments on Dispatches From Turtle Island: Hawks Refutes African Population Structure TheoryAndrew Oh-Willekehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02537151821869153861noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7315236707728759521.post-53748872897894060932012-08-15T23:19:41.500-06:002012-08-15T23:19:41.500-06:00"Likewise, a model in which the Neolithic rev..."Likewise, a model in which the Neolithic revolution in Europe (or pretty much anywhere else) took place predominantly via cultural diffusion has been pretty definitively ruled out". <br /><br />Especially in SE Asia. In spite of Maju's wish to see continuity in that region I have recently found a link that shows exactly what I have been trying to get through to him for ages: the population in SE Asia is basically a 'Papuan' population overlain by a 'Mongoloid' population who arrived only after the Early Neolithic: <br /><br />http://s1.zetaboards.com/anthroscape/topic/4646060/1/<br /><br />"its is reasonable to infer that the Ötzi genome with something on the order of 5.5% Neanderthal admixture probably had less Neanderthal admixture than Cro-Magnons in Northern Europe prior to the Last Glacial Maximum around 20,000 years ago did". <br /><br />I think your idea of progressive dilution is the most likely explanation for what we see today. terrythttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17327062321100035888noreply@blogger.com