tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7315236707728759521.post1263780288076681953..comments2024-03-27T22:28:06.861-06:00Comments on Dispatches From Turtle Island: Harappan, Dravidian and Indo-Aryan LegaciesAndrew Oh-Willekehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02537151821869153861noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7315236707728759521.post-53651313137416679282022-06-30T19:09:58.008-06:002022-06-30T19:09:58.008-06:00Southeast Asian aDNA has almost nothing to do with...Southeast Asian aDNA has almost nothing to do with any of these disputes. If we had it, it would pertain to Munda origins and migrations about which there is far less controversy concerning the overall narrative and about which the linguistic, archeological, and genetic evidence are telling a more or less consistent and unambiguous story.<br /><br />More ancient DNA from Eastern Iran, South India, and Southern Pakistan, on the other hand, could shed light on the issue addressed by this post, and might tell a more complex story.<br /><br />Among other issues, we still don't have enough data to really understand the story of Y-DNA T in South Asia, which may be critical to the Dravidian story.andrewhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08172964121659914379noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7315236707728759521.post-55430215104096782692022-06-30T13:53:33.858-06:002022-06-30T13:53:33.858-06:00Well, I think that when we get significant amounts...Well, I think that when we get significant amounts of aDNA from south east Asia that we will find that the story is much more complex than we imagined. Because that is the constant we have seen in Europe over the last five to seven years. And you might be right in some of the particulars, but I dare say it will be due to lucky guessing as much as penetrating analysis!Guyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15789570230699865921noreply@blogger.com