tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7315236707728759521.post3984104971651535542..comments2024-03-28T21:52:52.100-06:00Comments on Dispatches From Turtle Island: Something Very Amiss In Archaic Admixture PresentationAndrew Oh-Willekehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02537151821869153861noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7315236707728759521.post-43785285253293534352018-04-08T19:43:58.936-06:002018-04-08T19:43:58.936-06:0025k-40k is when Denisovans were living in Siberia ...25k-40k is when Denisovans were living in Siberia though. Good point on the data being specific to Papuans.Ryanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07906194112935320590noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7315236707728759521.post-44180160801856880532018-04-06T13:31:51.795-06:002018-04-06T13:31:51.795-06:00No. The 25k-40K is around the time that later wave...No. The 25k-40K is around the time that later waves of hunter-gatherers swept Asia, not Palo-Asians.<br /><br />Also, the date tendered is based on analysis of genetic data from Papuans and Australian Aborigines only, not of any mainland Asians.andrewhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08172964121659914379noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7315236707728759521.post-11810887903043908272018-04-06T09:26:23.168-06:002018-04-06T09:26:23.168-06:00I think 25k-40k is a realistic date for the second...I think 25k-40k is a realistic date for the second admixture event that affected only East Asian populations. Don't you?Ryanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07906194112935320590noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7315236707728759521.post-61076569275000866572018-04-05T21:16:18.906-06:002018-04-05T21:16:18.906-06:00Neanderthals and modern humans were more analogous...Neanderthals and modern humans were more analogous to horses and donkeys. And, no multiregionalism isn't very close at all to what happened. Minor admixture to a single common lineage does not equal to independent evolution of humans in multiple places from local archaic hominins.andrewhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08172964121659914379noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7315236707728759521.post-51491902948902390762018-04-05T20:43:05.196-06:002018-04-05T20:43:05.196-06:00Multiregionalism and Single origin seem to be both...Multiregionalism and Single origin seem to be both correct - one population of homo erectus in africa, with one lineage of mitochondria and y-chromosomes, evolved into homo sapiens, but this archaic sapiens can still mate with other archaic decedents of other homo erectus populations around the world. the difference between archaic sapiens and other homo erectus populations seem to be on par with different dog breeds or dogs and wolves.<br /><br />this seems to be the most direct reading of dna data. neohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17318664916557810347noreply@blogger.com