tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7315236707728759521.post6366467332309927134..comments2024-03-28T19:02:22.210-06:00Comments on Dispatches From Turtle Island: Even Science Is Resistant To The Scientific MethodAndrew Oh-Willekehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02537151821869153861noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7315236707728759521.post-38108535183566535552021-12-01T10:40:57.756-07:002021-12-01T10:40:57.756-07:00@Guy Good idea.
@Darayvus Thanks.@Guy Good idea.<br /><br />@Darayvus Thanks.andrewhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08172964121659914379noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7315236707728759521.post-36812859768375557462021-12-01T08:19:56.602-07:002021-12-01T08:19:56.602-07:00the last two links are deadthe last two links are deadDarayvushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17973750966981889517noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7315236707728759521.post-49206944276695827432021-12-01T06:19:00.782-07:002021-12-01T06:19:00.782-07:00Hum... Yes and no? When a field is moving quickly,...Hum... Yes and no? When a field is moving quickly, like aDNA or all the CRIPR variants in bio-chemistry I don't think this ossification of opinions occurs. The researchers have too many interesting things to do to have food fights. When a field slows down and fragments into smaller almost identical cliques, separated by inherited (in the academic sense) dogmas, then this kind of behavior can occur. So a metric could be proposed, if a field is dominated by old folks and their direct followers then then it's in the slow change zone. Heck it's almost a truism.<br />Cheers,<br />GuyGuyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15789570230699865921noreply@blogger.com