The three waves of migration revealed by ancient DNA from Crete conforms to the existing paradigm (and tends to support the connection of the Minoan language with pre-Indo-European Anatolian languages), but the high rate of cousin marriage there was a surprise.
[O]n Crete and the other Greek islands, as well as on the mainland, it was very common to marry one's first cousin 4000 years ago. "More than a thousand ancient genomes from different regions of the world have now been published, but it seems that such a strict system of kin marriage did not exist anywhere else in the ancient world," says Eirini Skourtanioti, the lead author of the study who conducted the analyses.
From here, discussing the paper whose abstract and citation are as follows:
The Neolithic and Bronze Ages were highly transformative periods for the genetic history of Europe but for the Aegean—a region fundamental to Europe’s prehistory—the biological dimensions of cultural transitions have been elucidated only to a limited extent so far.
We have analysed newly generated genome-wide data from 102 ancient individuals from Crete, the Greek mainland and the Aegean Islands, spanning from the Neolithic to the Iron Age. We found that the early farmers from Crete shared the same ancestry as other contemporaneous Neolithic Aegeans.
In contrast, the end of the Neolithic period and the following Early Bronze Age were marked by ‘eastern’ gene flow, which was predominantly of Anatolian origin in Crete.
Confirming previous findings for additional Central/Eastern European ancestry in the Greek mainland by the Middle Bronze Age, we additionally show that such genetic signatures appeared in Crete gradually from the seventeenth to twelfth centuries BC, a period when the influence of the mainland over the island intensified.
Biological and cultural connectedness within the Aegean is also supported by the finding of consanguineous endogamy practiced at high frequencies, unprecedented in the global ancient DNA record. Our results highlight the potential of archaeogenomic approaches in the Aegean for unravelling the interplay of genetic admixture, marital and other cultural practices.
Skourtanioti, E., Ringbauer, H., Gnecchi Ruscone, G.A. et al. "Ancient DNA reveals admixture history and endogamy in the prehistoric Aegean." Nat Ecol Evol (January 16, 2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-022-01952-3
The body text of the paper relates that:
In addition to this high frequency of distant genetic relatedness, we also report extraordinarily high levels of consanguinity (~50% of the 27 individuals) estimated from the runs of homozygosity (ROH) by performing hapROH on the genotyping data. The individual ROH histograms matched more with the expectations for parents being related to the degree of first cousins, half-siblings and aunt/uncle–nephew/niece. . . . Coupling the evidence for frequent distant relatives and cousin–cousin unions suggests that those individuals formed a small endogamous community that regularly practiced first-cousin intermarriages.Intriguingly, endogamy is not a unique feature of Hagios Charalambos. We applied the method on another 61 Aegean individuals from all the periods that met recommended SNP coverage thresholds. In total, we found that ~30% of the individuals have most of their ROH in the bin of the longest ROH blocks, consistent with being offspring of parents related to a degree equivalent to first and second cousins. Offspring of close-kin unions were identified from the Neolithic through the LBA but due to the uneven sampling no conclusions can be drawn regarding temporal trends. Consanguinity was also present in higher frequency in the smaller islands of Salamis, Lazarides, Koukounaries and Koufonisia (50%) but overall it seemed common throughout the Aegean. The observed high frequency of endogamy diachronically points to a rather common social practice in the prehistoric Aegean that is so far unattested in the rest of the global aDNA record.
According to Wiki, this book suggests an Anatolian invasion of Crete around 1,700.
ReplyDeletehttps://archive.org/details/mcdougallittellw00beck
Seems like perceptive work on their part.
Sounds about right. Give or take a hundred years or so.
ReplyDeleteI'd note that Ancient Pages site you're linking to seems very sketch by the way.
ReplyDeletehttps://www.ancientpages.com/2020/03/30/ancient-dna-reveals-irish-are-not-celts-irish-ancestors-came-from-biblical-lands-scientists-say/
@Ryan I'd be concerned about that if it weren't for the fact that the found the source paper in a peer reviewed academic journal that it was citing which confirms the quoted claims.
ReplyDelete