According to a new study, ancient footprints and drag marks at White Sands National Park in New Mexico suggest the earliest known North Americans used wooden travois-like "vehicles" to transport goods, and possibly even people, 22,000 years ago.
This account is based upon:
A travois is crafted from one or more wooden poles and is one of the simplest prehistoric vehicles. Although these devices likely played vital roles in the lives of ancient peoples, they have low preservation potential in the archaeological record. Here we report linear features associated with human footprints, some of which are dated to ∼22,000 years old, preserved in fine-grained sediments at White Sands National Park (New Mexico, USA). Using a range of examples, we identify three morphological types of trace in late Pleistocene sediments. Type I features occur as single, or bifurcating, narrow (depth > width) grooves which extend in planform from 2 to 50 m in length and trace either straight, gently curved or more irregular lines. They are associated with human footprints, which are truncated longitudinally by the groove and are not associated with other animal tracks. Type II examples are broader (width > depth) and form shallow runnels that typically have straight planforms and may truncate human footprints to one side. Type III examples consist of two parallel, equidistant grooves between 250 and 350 mm apart. They trace gently curving lines that can extend for 30+ m. Human footprints are associated with these features and may occur between, and to the side of, the parallel grooves. We review a range of possible interpretations including both human and non-human explanations and conclude that the most parsimonious explanation is that they represent drag marks formed by travois consisting of a single pole or crossed poles pulled by humans, presumably during the transport of resources. As such this unique footprint record may represent one of the earliest pieces of evidence for the use of transport technology.
Bennett, M. R., et al., "The ichnology of White Sands (New Mexico): Linear traces and human footprints, evidence of transport technology?" Quaternary Science Advances, 17(100274), 100274 (2025) (open access) doi:10.1016/j.qsa.2025.100274
The dating was confirmed in this 2023 paper:
Editor’s summary
Traditionally, researchers believed that humans arrived in North America around 16,000 to 13,000 years ago. Recently, however, evidence has accumulated supporting a much earlier date. In 2021, fossilized footprints from White Sands National Park in New Mexico were dated to between 20,000 and 23,000 years ago, providing key evidence for earlier occupation, although this finding was controversial. Pigati et al. returned to the White Sands footprints and obtained new dates from multiple, highly reliable sources (see the Perspective by Philippsen). They, too, resolved dates of 20,000 to 23,000 years ago, reconfirming that humans were present far south of the ice sheets during the Last Glacial Maximum.
—Sacha Vignieri
Abstract
Human footprints at White Sands National Park, New Mexico, USA, reportedly date to between ~23,000 and 21,000 years ago according to radiocarbon dating of seeds from the aquatic plant Ruppia cirrhosa. These ages remain controversial because of potential old carbon reservoir effects that could compromise their accuracy. We present new calibrated 14C ages of terrestrial pollen collected from the same stratigraphic horizons as those of the Ruppia seeds, along with optically stimulated luminescence ages of sediments from within the human footprint–bearing sequence, to evaluate the veracity of the seed ages. The results show that the chronologic framework originally established for the White Sands footprints is robust and reaffirm that humans were present in North America during the Last Glacial Maximum.
Jeffrey S. Pigati, et al., "Independent age estimates resolve the controversy of ancient human footprints at White Sands" 382 (6666) Science 73-75 (October 5, 2023).
Broken record time... Why didn't they expand? AMH expand like mold in a closed container or fire ants across the South. If they could live in the harsh conditions of the SouthWest around White Sands then they would have loved many of the more congenial areas of North America.
ReplyDeleteThe leading hypothesis is that this wave of modern humans prior to the main founding population of the Americas had too small of an effective population size, and to narrow of a set of skills, to thrive. (They probably also didn't have dogs, unlike the primary founding population of the Americas.)
ReplyDeleteThere has been a response article to the original footprints article, critical of the dating, claiming the human and animal prints were from different levels but winds or water gave the appearance of the same era.
ReplyDeleteIn a comment to Andrews response (which I realize is not Andrew's opinion): You can't get into the arid southwest without passing through real nice places to live. Those places have much lower cultural-technology requirements, in particular the Mediterranean-like California costal area.
ReplyDeleteI don't disagree that it's a mystery. White Sands, NM is far inland. There are lots of nicer places in the West that are closer to the Pacific Ocean (although the climate was significantly different during the LGM 20,000 years ago, for instance, it almost certainly wasn't as hot or barren). The dating could be wrong, but three or four independent methods were used and confirmed each other.
ReplyDelete