I support recognizing the proposed new class of "Satellite Planets."
The International Astronomical Union definitions for Planet and Dwarf Planet both require that a body has sufficient mass to overcome rigid body forces and self gravitate into a nearly round shape. However, quantitative standards for determining when a body is sufficiently round have been lacking.
Previously published triaxial ellipsoid solutions for asteroids, satellites, and Dwarf Planets in the radius range 135 to 800 km are examined to identify a minimum mass above which the entire population, regardless of composition, is round. From this data, the minimum mass to meet the roundness criterion is 5.0 x 10E20 kg.
The triaxial shape data suggests three radius ranges: (1) bodies with a radius less than 160 km are non-spheroidal, (2) bodies with a radius in the range 160 to 450 km are transitional in shape or nearly round, (3) bodies with a radius greater than 450 km are spheroidal. Bodies orbiting the Sun with a mass greater than 5.0 x 10E20 kg are Planets or Dwarf Planets.
Arguments are presented for including the 16 spheroidal moons of the Solar System as a third dynamical class that can be identified as Satellite Planets. Definitions are proposed that expand upon the taxonomy started in 2006 with the International Astronomomical Union Planet and Dwarf Planet classes.
David G. Russell, "The Minimum Mass of Planets, Dwarf Planets, and Planetary-scale Satellites" arXiv:2504.07161 (April 9, 2025).
No comments:
Post a Comment