Grab Bag Physics Articles

It may be possible to increase the precision with which the top quark mass is measured by a factor of ten to an uncertainty of plus or minus 30 MeV at a next generation positron-electron collider.

Constraints from Big Bang Nucleosynthesis significantly constrain the possibility of heavy neutral leptons (i.e. basically heavy, sterile neutrinos), allowing for the possible parameter space to be constrained from both above and below, potentially making it possible to rule out these hypothetical particles entirely, and in the meantime, focusing the search for them.

The Big Picture In Astrophysics Research

It is more statistical than an analytic description of the most important scientific advances, but it is still a notable overview. Certainly, there is no room to dispute that there has been a surge in astrophysics papers.

Over the past few years, Astrophysics has experienced an unprecedented increase in research output, as is evident from the year-over-year increase in the number of research papers put onto the arXiv. As a result, keeping up with progress happening outside our respective sub-fields can be exhausting. While it is impossible to be informed on every single aspect of every sub-field, this paper aims to be the next best thing. 

We present a summary of statistics for every paper uploaded onto the Astrophysics arXiv over the past year - 2025. We analyse a host of metadata ranging from simple metrics like the number of pages and the most used keywords, as well as deeper, more interesting statistics like the distribution of journals to which papers are submitted, the most used telescopes, the most studied astrophysical objects including GW, GRB, FRB events, exoplanets and much more. We also indexed the authors' affiliations to put into context the global distribution of research and collaboration. 

Combining this data with the citation information of each paper allows us to understand how influential different papers have been on the progress of the field this year. Overall, these statistics highlight the general current state of the field, the hot topics people are working on and the different research communities across the globe and how they function. 

We also delve into the costs involved in publications and what it means for the community. We hope that this is helpful for both students and professionals alike to adapt their current trajectories to better benefit the field.

Rommulus Francis Lewis, Hetansh Shah, Amruth Alfred, "Astrophysics Wrapped 2025: Year-in-Review of Every Astrophysics arXiv Paper from 2025" arXiv:2602.12303 (February 11, 2026).

X17 News

The viable parameter space for the hypothetic X17 particle (with a mass of about 17 MeV) proposed to explain some unexpected nuclear physics is very nearly null.

In recent years, the ATOMKI collaboration has performed a series of measurements of excited nuclei, observing a resonant excess of electron-positron pairs at large opening angles compared to the Standard Model prediction. 

The excess has been hypothesized to be due to the production of a new spin-1 or spin-0 particle, X17, with a mass of about 17 MeV. 

Recently, the PADME experiment has reported an excess in the e+e− cross section at center-of-mass energies near 17 MeV, perhaps further hinting at the existence of a new state. Studies of the spin-1 case have hitherto focused on either vector or axial-vector couplings to quarks and leptons, whereas UV theories more naturally produce both vector and axial-vector i.e. chiral couplings, analogous to the Standard Model weak interactions. 

We consider the ATOMKI anomalies in the context of an X with chiral couplings to quarks and explore the parameter space that can explain the ATOMKI anomalies, contrasting them with experimental constraints. 

We find that it is possible to accommodate the reported ATOMKI signals. However, the 99% CL region is in tension with null results from searches for atomic parity violation and direct searches for new low mass physics coupled to electrons. This tension is found to be driven by the magnitude of the reported excess in the transition of 12C(17.23), which drives the best-fit region towards excluded couplings.

Max H. Fieg, Toni Mäkelä, Tim M.P. Tait, Miša Toman, "The X17 with Chiral Couplings" arXiv:2602.11263 (February 11, 2026).

A Provocative Emergent Gravity Theory

This essay argues that gravity emerges from the running of physical constants with energy scale (called the Renormalization Group flow), and that this viewpoint can guide us to a viable theory of quantum gravity. It explains why this approach is not ruled out by "no go" theorems in the quantum gravity field, and what the existing paradigm for trying to develop a theory of quantum gravity may ge futile.

It's only ten pages long and more readable than many papers on the topic, so give it a read.

In this essay and utilizing the holographic Renormalization Group (RG) flow, we demonstrate how the effective action of a non-gravitating quantum field theory in the ultraviolet (UV) develops an Einstein-Hilbert term in the infrared (IR). That is, gravity is induced by the RG flow. 

An inherent outcome of holography that plays a crucial role in our analysis is the RG flow of boundary conditions: the rigid Dirichlet conditions on the background metric in the UV become an admixture of Dirichlet and Neumann as we flow to the IR, thereby ``unfreezing'' the metric and transforming it from a non-dynamical background into a dynamical field. 

This mechanism, which is a conceptually new addition to the standard Wilsonian RG flow, also provides the mechanism to evade the Weinberg-Witten no-go theorem. 

Within the GR from RG picture outlined here, the search for a quantum theory of gravity by treating the metric as a fundamental field may be a hunt for a phantom -- akin to seeking the atomic structure of water by quantizing the equations of hydrodynamics.

M.M. Sheikh-Jabbari, V. Taghiloo, "GR from RG: Gravity Is Induced From Renormalization Group Flow In The Infrared" arXiv:2602.11806 (February 12, 2026) (Essay written for the Gravity Research Foundation 2026 Awards for Essays on Gravitation).

The S8 Tension

The parameter S(8) quantifies how homogeneous the entire Universe is in terms of matter density, with lower values being more homogeneous than larger values. At higher values, matter is more concentrated in clumps and webs of high matter density, while comparative cosmic voids are bigger and more deep. At lower values, the amount of matter in a volume of space doesn't vary as much across the universe.

S(8) appears to vary between the early-universe and late universe, even though in the paradigmatic ΛCDM model of cosmology, which has been battered by numerous contradictions with astronomy observations, this parameter should remain the same. This tension has also been parallel to the Hubble tension, causing many astrophysicists to suspect that  they have a common cause.

The S8 tension between the early-universe and late universe, however, may be substantially a function of systemic measurement errors, rather than a real phenomena, as a new review article observes.

The parameter S(8)≡σ(8)*(Ωm/0.3)^0.5 quantifies the amplitude of matter density fluctuations. A persistent discrepancy exists between early-universe CMB observations and late-universe probes. 

This review assesses the ``S8 tension'' against a new 2026 baseline: a unified ``Combined CMB'' framework incorporating Planck, ACT DR6, and SPT-3G. This combined analysis yields S(8) = 0.836 + 0.012 − 0.013, providing a higher central value and reduced uncertainties compared to Planck alone. 

Compiling measurements from 2019-2026, we reveal a striking bifurcation: 

DES Year 6 results exhibit a statistically significant tension of 2.4σ--2.7σ (DESY6), whereas KiDS Legacy results demonstrate statistical consistency at <1σ (Wright2025). 

We examine systematic origins of this dichotomy, including photometric redshift calibration, intrinsic alignment modeling, and shear measurement pipelines. We further contextualize these findings with cluster counts (where eROSITA favors high values while SPT favors low), galaxy-galaxy lensing, and redshift-space distortions. The heterogeneous landscape suggests survey-specific systematic effects contribute substantially to observed discrepancies, though new physics beyond ΛCDM cannot be excluded.

Ioannis Pantos, Leandros Perivolaropoulos, "Status of the S8 Tension: A 2026 Review of Probe Discrepancies" arXiv:2602.12238 (February 12, 2026).