Wednesday, February 22, 2023

Homo Erectus Held On Until 100,000 Years Ago In Indonesia

The three year old article quoted below speculates that some Southeast Asians may have a small amount of Homo Erectus ancestry. But I think that this is unlikely to have happened directly, due to the lack of overlap in human and Homo Erectus occupation and genetic differences too great to permit the birth of a hybrid individual (although it could be that modern humans dealt the death blow to relict Homo Erectus when they first encountered them en route to Australia and Papua New Guinea, which contrary to the Science article, happened closer to 70,000 years ago, perhaps shortly after the volcanic Toba eruption in Indonesia ca. 74,000 years ago).

But, it isn't inconceivable that an archaic Denisovan individual, a sister species to the Neanderthals and one source of archaic hominin admixture in modern humans, might have admixed with Homo Erectus, with whom they probably co-habited in Indonesia for thousands of years, leading to a small proportion of a modern human with Denisovan ancestry's Denisovan sourced DNA including Homo Erectus ancestry (perhaps about a percent of a percent, i.e. a few parts per 10,000). Indeed, there are some hints in Denisovan DNA of small amounts of admixture with H. erectus, although this is too small to be definitively identified separately in modern humans with Denisovan ancestry (which can be as high as about 5% of some aboriginal Australians and Papuans and Negritos from the Philippines today).

The time coincidence with the genetically estimated most recent common ancestor of Neanderthals and Denisovans, however, is a pretty close match to the time that H. erectus disappears in the archaeological record outside Indonesia, which also isn't that remote from the first appearance of modern humans. Therefore, it wouldn't be unreasonable to guess that modern humans, Neanderthals, and Denisovans were the cause of the extinction of H. erectus in their respective regions. 

If so, Denisovans may have been a very late arrival to the island of Java (i.e. ca. 100,000 years ago or later) and cohabited with them only briefly, which could explain the ability to H. erectus to persist there while going extinct everywhere else. It could also be the case that Denisovan's brought about the extinction of H. erectus in Indonesia tens of thousands of years before modern humans arrived on a path cleared by the Toba eruption.

H. floresiensis a.k.a. "hobbits" also co-habited in Indonesia with H. erectus and Denisovans (and possibly even modern humans), although it is unclear when they first appeared on the island of Flores. But, they were probably an even more basal (i.e. archaic) species of hominin than H. erectus such as H. habilis. So, they probably didn't directly admix genetically with Denisovans or modern humans due to their large genetic distance from them.
When seafaring modern humans ventured onto the island of Java some 40,000 years ago, they found a rainforest-covered land teeming with life—but they weren’t the first humans to call the island home. Their distant ancestor, Homo erectus, had traveled to Java when it was connected to the mainland via land bridges and lived there for approximately 1.5 million years. These people made their last stand on the island about 100,000 years ago, long after they had gone extinct elsewhere in the world, according a new study assigning reliable dates to previously found H. erectus fossils. 
. . . 
The newly dated fossils also bookend the existence of a remarkably long-lived human species, says Patrick Roberts, an archaeologist at the Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History in Jena, Germany, who wasn’t involved with the study. 
. . .

H. erectus arose in Africa about 1.9 million years ago. These toolmakers with relatively large brains migrated out of Africa and across Asia, crossing into Java by land bridges about 1.6 million years ago, when savanna-like open woodland covered much of the land. Later, sea levels rose, isolating these ancient Javans on an island. Meanwhile, in Africa and mainland Asia, H. erectus disappeared by about 500,000 years ago. 
. . . 
In 2008 and 2010, [the new study’s lead author, paleoanthropologist Russell] Ciochon’s team re-excavated the site, turning up 867 new fossils belonging to deer, wild cattle, and an extinct, elephantlike animal called a stegodon. Based on photographs and documents from the original excavation, they established that some of the newly found animal fossils came from the same rich bone bed as the H. erectus fossils. The researchers applied five types of radiometric dating, including a new method that provides both minimum and maximum dates, to those animal fossils and the sediments around them. The team concluded that the bones were buried between 117,000 and 108,000 years ago, the researchers report . . . in Nature.
From Science (reporting on a December 18, 2019 article in Nature).

18 comments:

neo said...

due to the lack of overlap in human and Homo Erectus occupation and genetic differences too great to permit the birth of a hybrid individual

didn't humans evolve from Homo Erectus

andrew said...

"didn't humans evolve from Homo Erectus"

Only through intermediate archaic hominin species.

neo said...

the new theory

African multiregionalism
This theory, known as “African multiregionalism,” is a fundamentally different view of how we came to be. It's saying that no single place or population gave rise to us. It's saying that the cradle of humankind was the entirety of Africa.Jul 11, 2018

The New Story of Humanity's Origins in Africa - The Atlantic

Beyond multiregional and simple out-of-Africa models of human evolution

Eleanor M. L. Scerri, Lounès Chikhi & Mark G. Thomas

Nature Ecology & Evolution volume 3, pages 1370–1372 (2019)Cite this article

4140 Accesses

42 Citations

308 Altmetric

Metrics details

The past half century has seen a move from a multiregionalist view of human origins to widespread acceptance that modern humans emerged in Africa. Here the authors argue that a simple out-of-Africa model is also outdated, and that the current state of the evidence favours a structured African metapopulation model of human origins.

For decades, polarized debates about human origins have swung between two major models. Classic multiregionalism viewed the majority of our ancestry as being spread across the Old World over the past one to two million years, and emphasized regional continuity. The recent and simple out-of-Africa (SOA)

Guy said...

Hum... The hominid fossil record in Africa is so scanty that it is easy to populate it all sort of unicorns and dragons. Based on what happened in Eurasia it's more likely that one lineage came to dominate Africa in a fairly short time period. Maybe that lineage had two parent lineages and each of them maybe two, but it's not like all the branches came together together to make AMH. It was a bush (with recombination) and one branch wiped the others out. Or there was a prune event and one branch got lucky. But hominids are a canny bunch and a prune event that would target many branches would leave a obvious signature in other species.

Ryan said...

"Hum... The hominid fossil record in Africa is so scanty that it is easy to populate it all sort of unicorns and dragons. Based on what happened in Eurasia it's more likely that one lineage came to dominate Africa in a fairly short time period. "

Homo Naledi's late survival disfavours that.

neo said...

how is Homo Naledi' different than H. habilis or H. erectus

andrew said...

H. habilis and H. erectus are our ancestors. H. naledi is a sister clade of some of our fairly basal archaic hominin ancestors.

neo said...

i suspect H. habilis and H. erectus H. naledi are the same species

andrew said...

@neo

What makes you think that?

Ryan said...

My point was more that Homo Naledi survived until a couple hundred thousand years ago. So clearly we didn't see the mass pruning you suggest until very recently.

neo said...

the range of variation of H. habilis and H. erectus H. naledi is comparable to H sapien and Neanderthal

Ryan said...

I think you're missing the point that H Naledi and H Sapien coexisted in Africa.

Tom Bridgeland said...

Africa is huge, and different regions are separated by bands of severe terrain, climate, and disease. Compare Swahili, Bushman, Pygmy, Hottentot. Were they only fossils we would be assuming they were different sub-species.

Mark B. said...

Regarding 'African multiregionlism' - makes my head hurt. Species do not evolve continent-wide. Species evolve - can only evolve - as interbreeding populations. Populations in southwest Africa didn't interbreed with populations in the East African rift. Populations in central Africa did not interbreed with coastal Mediterranean populations. And the same new population did not evolve in each different geographic region at the same time. It can't happen. It requires a bone-centric, abiological mindset to think otherwise. It's flat earth stuff.

neo said...

African multiregionlism' is based on fossil and DNA evidence

Ryan said...

Sorry neo I just realized I got you an Guy confused.

DDeden said...

integrative geochronological framework for the Pleistocene So'a Basin (Flores, Indonesia),
and its implications for faunal turnover and hominin arrival
Gert Van den Bergh, Brent V Alloway, Michael Storey & Michael J Morwood 2022
Quat.Sci.Rev.294,107721

- The ancestral population of H.floresiensis probably arrived on Flores after 1.3 Ma, certainly before 1 Ma.
- The oldest mega-fauna on Flores (Komodo dragon, diminutive Stegodon, giant tortoise) was present on Flores by 1.4 Ma.
- A fauna turn-over coincided with the Mid-Pleistocene Transition & a shift from a forested to a grassland-dominated biotope in the So'a Basin.
- Despite major volcanic eruptions & climate oscillations, a stable fauna appears to have persisted until Hs arrival 46 ka.
- Chemical fingerprinting of distal tephra layers in the So'a Basin has the potential for regional tephro-stratigraphic correlations.

Flores represents a unique insular environment, with an extensive record of Pleistocene fossil remains & stone artefacts.
In the So'a Basin (C-Flores) these include
- endemic Stegodon, Komodo dragons, giant tortoises, rats, birds & hominins,
- lithic artefacts, that can be traced back to at least 1 Ma.
This comprehensive review presents important new data re.the dating & faunal sequence of the So'a Basin, incl. the site of Mata Menge, where H.floresiensis-like fossils ∼0.7 Ma were discovered in 2014.
By chemical fingerprinting key silicic tephra from local & distal eruptive sources, we have now established basin-wide tephro-stratigraphic correlations,
together with new numerical ages, we present an update of the chrono-stratigraphy of the So'a Basin + major implications for the faunal sequence.
These results show:
a giant tortoise & the diminutive proboscidean Stegodon sondaari last occurred at the site of Tangi Talo ∼1.3 Ma (not 0.9 Ma as previously thought).
We also present new data suggesting:
the disappearance of giant tortoise & S.sondaari from the sedimentary record occurred before, or was coincident with, the earliest hominin arrival:
the first records of lithic artefacts occurred directly below the 1 Ma Wolo Sege Tephra.

andrew said...

@DDeden

Interesting paper.