Astrophysics Papers
Black hole physicists are skeptical of leading cosmology paradigms.
The cosmological constant, cosmological inflation, and string theory, all lack majority support among black hole physicists. Also, a majority of them take the position that the Big Bang means that "the universe evolved from a hot dense state", not "an absolute beginning time" which is the weaker of the two possible definitions of what the Big Bang theory means.
The purpose of this survey is to take a snapshot of the attitudes of physicists, which may be useful to sociologists and historians of science. A total of 85 completed surveys were returned out of 151 registered participants of the "Black holes Inside and out" conference, held in Copenhagen in 2024. The survey asked questions about the nature of black holes and some of the most contentious issues in fundamental physics. A number of surprising results were found.
For example, some of the leading frameworks, such the cosmological constant, cosmic inflation, or string theory, while most popular, gain less than majority of votes from the participants. The only statement that gains majority approval (by 68% of participants) was that the Big Bang means that "the universe evolved from a hot dense state", not "an absolute beginning time".
This provides reasons for caution in describing ideas as consensus in the scientific community when a more nuanced view may be justified.
MOND still works.
Meanwhile, MOND still works to explain early galaxies, while LamdaCDM theory does not:
We investigate the shape and morphology of early-type galaxies (ETGs) within the framework of Modified Newtonian Dynamics (MOND).
Building on our previous studies, which demonstrated that the monolithic collapse of primordial gas clouds in MOND produces galaxies (noted throughout as 'model relics' in the context of this work) with short star formation timescales and a downsizing effect as observationally found, we present new analyses on the resulting structural and morphological properties of these systems. Initially, the monolithically formed galaxies display disk-like structures.
In this study, we further analyze the transformations that occur when these galaxies merge, observing that the resulting systems (noted throughout as 'merged galaxies' in the context of this work) take on elliptical-like shapes, with the (V_rot/V_sigma) - ellipticity relations closely matching observational data across various projections. We extend this analysis by examining the isophotal shapes and rotational parameter (lambda_R) of both individual relics and merged galaxies.
The results indicate that ETGs may originate in pairs in dense environments, with mergers subsequently producing elliptical structures that align well with observed kinematic and morphological characteristics. Finally, we compare both the model relics and merged galaxies with the fundamental plane and Kormendy relation of observed ETGs, finding close agreement. Together, these findings suggest that MOND provides a viable physical framework for the rapid formation and morphological evolution of ETGs.
Robin Eappen, Pavel Kroupa, "Scaling relations of early-type galaxies in MOND" arXiv:2503.15600 (March 19, 2025) (published in Galaxies 2025, 13, 22).
Primordial black hole dark matter still doesn't work.
New strict bounds on primordial black holes as dark matter that don't share systemic errors with other comparably strictly bounding observations have been found. This is consistent with a mountain of evidence strongly disfavoring primordial black holes as a significant source of dark matter phenomena.
High Energy Physics Papers
Heavy neutrinos have not been found.
There is no evidence from the LHC for a "heavy neutral lepton" (basically a heavy neutrino) up to masses of 14.5 GeV. This is not all that huge of a finding as W and Z boson decays largely rule out neutrinos beyond the three Standard Model active neutrinos with masses of less than about 45 GeV.
Hints of up to two kinds of possible heavy Higgs bosons.
Note the while the observational evidence of the neutral scalar S boson resonance, conceptualized as an intermediate mass Higgs boson (relative to the Standard Model Higgs boson which is an electromagnetically neutral, spin-0, even parity, 125 GeV particle with couplings proportional to the Standard Model fundamental particle masses) is very strong, the evidence of a heavy neutral H boson resonance that is a heavy Higgs boson isn't a part of the simplified model examined that is as definitively established. It would have to have a mass of at least about 302 GeV, but even its mass does not seem to have been definitively pinned down.
Despite the high statistical significance of the resonance, I wouldn't consider it established yet for reasons including a lack of replication so far, and a lack of a full exploration of the implications of the hypothesized two new fundamental bosons. I personally also need to take some time to figure out what couplings and other properties it is proposed to have, and more generally, to better understand the theory behind it. This latest paper is also not peer reviewed or published yet, although there is no good reason to think that this won't happen.
Aside from popping into existence in high energy physics experiments and decaying, ultimately, into W bosons and b quarks and an invisible decay mode, it isn't clear what phenomenological impact these heavy Higgs bosons would have, or what the apparent invisible decay mode of the S boson would be (the default assumption, without more Standard Model physics, would be neutrinos).
It also isn't clear to me at this time if alternative explanations for this resonance that do not involve new physics have been considered or proposed. But both the H boson and the S boson seem to be much more massive than any hadron with two to six valence quarks. The S boson, at least, is also too light and apparently too long lived, to have a top quark component. Could the H and S bosons be simply excited resonances of the 125 GeV Standard Model Higgs boson? I've seen proposals along those lines before in the literature (prior to the discovery of these resonances).
But, these proposed new particles are more credible than, for example, the X17 boson hypothesis.
The Higgs boson discovery at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) at CERN confirmed the existence of the last missing particle of the Standard Model (SM). The existence of new fundamental constituents of matter beyond the SM is of great importance for our understanding of Nature.
In this context, indirect (non-resonant) indications for new scalar bosons were found in the data from the first run of the LHC, taken between 2010 and 2012 at CERN: an excess in the invariant mass of muon-electron pairs, consistent with a new Higgs boson (S) with a mass of 150±5 GeV. Other processes with multiple leptons in the final state, moderate missing energy, and possibly (bottom quark) jets exhibit deviations from the SM predictions. These anomalies can be explained within a simplified model in which a new heavy Higgs boson H decays into two lighter Higgses S. This lighter Higgs S subsequently decays to W bosons, bottom quarks and has also an invisible decay mode.
Here, we demonstrate that using this model we can identify narrow excesses in di-photon and Z-photon spectra around 152 GeV. By incorporating the latest measurements of di-photons in association with leptons, we obtain a combined global significance of 5.4σ.
This represents the highest significance ever reported for an excess consistent with a narrow resonance beyond the SM (BSM) in high-energy proton-proton collision data at the LHC. Such findings have the potential to usher in a new era in particle physics - the BSM epoch - offering crucial insights into unresolved puzzles of nature.
Srimoy Bhattacharya, et al., "Emerging Excess Consistent with a Narrow Resonance at 152 GeV in High-Energy Proton-Proton Collisions" arXiv:2503.16245 (March 20, 2025).
Incidentally, the paper also cites the two main papers that predicted the existence of the Standard Model Higgs boson, which I reproduce below for future reference:
* Higgs, P.W.: Broken symmetries, massless particles and gauge fields. Phys. Lett. 12, 132–133 (1964) https://doi.org/10.1016/0031-9163(64)91136-9
* Englert, F., Brout, R.: Broken Symmetry and the Mass of Gauge Vector Mesons. Phys. Rev. Lett. 13, 321–323 (1964) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.13. 321