Many investigators favor a form of dark energy that can vary over time to the cosmological constant, although both theories can fit the evidence within the bounds of statistical significance. A varying dark energy cosmology, when applied to available data, more tightly bounds the upper limit to the sum of the neutrino masses.
We explore cosmological constraints on the sum of the three active neutrino massesSunny Vagnozzi, et al., "Constraints on the sum of the neutrino masses in dynamical dark energy models with w(z)≥−1 are tighter than those obtained in ΛCDM" (January 25, 2018).Mν in the context of dynamical dark energy (DDE) models with equation of state (EoS) parametrized as a function of redshiftz byw(z)=w0+waz/(1+z) , and satisfyingw(z)≥−1 for allz . We perform a Bayesian analysis and show that, within these models, the bounds onMν \textit{do not degrade} with respect to those obtained in theΛ CDM case; in fact the bounds are slightly tighter, despite the enlarged parameter space. We explain our results based on the observation that, for fixed choices ofw0,wa such thatw(z)≥−1 (but notw=−1 for allz ), the upper limit onMν is tighter than theΛ CDM limit because of the well-known degeneracy betweenw andMν . The Bayesian analysis we have carried out then integrates over the possible values ofw0 -wa such thatw(z)≥−1 , all of which correspond to tighter limits onMν than theΛ CDM limit. We find a 95\% confidence level (C.L.) upper bound ofMν<0.13eV . This bound can be compared withMν<0.16eV at 95\%~C.L., obtained within theΛ CDM model, andMν<0.41eV at 95\%~C.L., obtained in a DDE model with arbitrary EoS (which allows values ofw<−1 ). Contrary to the results derived for DDE models with arbitrary EoS, we find that a dark energy component withw(z)≥−1 is unable to alleviate the tension between high-redshift observables and direct measurements of the Hubble constantH0 . Finally, in light of the results of this analysis, we also discuss the implications for DDE models of a possible determination of the neutrino mass hierarchy by laboratory searches. (abstract abridged)
No comments:
Post a Comment