Monday, January 5, 2026

An Alternative To MOND and Dark Matter

This deserves further attention. 

We present a new empirical model for galaxy rotation curves that introduces a velocity correction term omega, derived from observed stellar motion and anchored to Keplerian baselines. Unlike parametric halo models or modified gravity theories, this approach does not alter Newtonian dynamics or invoke dark matter distributions. Instead, it identifies a repeatable kinematic offset that aligns with observed rotation profiles across a wide range of galaxies. Using SPARC data [1], we demonstrate that this model consistently achieves high fidelity fits, often outperforming MOND and CDM halo models in RMSE and R-squared metrics without parametric tuning. The method is reproducible, minimally dependent on mass modeling, and offers a streamlined alternative for characterizing galactic dynamics. While the velocity correction omega lacks a definitive physical interpretation, its empirical success invites further exploration. We position this model as a local kinematic tool rather than a cosmological framework, and we welcome dialogue on its implications for galactic structure and gravitational theory. Appendix B presents RMSE and R2 comparisons showing that this method consistently outperforms MOND and CDM halo models across a representative galaxy sample.
David C. Flynn, Jim Cannaliato, "A New Empirical Fit to Galaxy Rotation Curves" arXiv:2601.00522 (January 2, 2026) (published at 12 Front. Astron. Space Sci. 1680387 (2025)).

2 comments:

Manuel said...

Seems very suspicious. This method does not predict rotation curves at all! You first need to observe the rotation curve and pick parameters (radius and velocities) from it for the equation they propose!

andrew said...

Fair point.