Antimatter Does Not Have Negative Gravitational Mass

Kroupa comes up with a clever way to rule out a theory rooted in the notion that antimatter has negative gravitational mass without directly measuring it, using solar system based constraints.

The gravitational dipole theory of Hadjukovic (2010) is based on the hypothesis that antimatter has a negative gravitational mass and thus falls upwards on Earth. 

Astrophysically, the model is similar to but more fundamental than Modified Newtonian Dynamics (MOND), with the Newtonian gravity gN towards an isolated point mass boosted by the factor ν=1+(α/x)tanh(x√/α), where x≡gN/a0 and a0=1.2×10^−10 m/s2 is the MOND acceleration constant. We show that α must lie in the range 0.4−1 to acceptably fit galaxy rotation curves. 

In the Solar System, this interpolating function implies an extra Sunwards acceleration of αa0. This would cause Saturn to deviate from Newtonian expectations by 7000(α/0.4) km over 15 years, starting from known initial position and velocity on a near-circular orbit. 

We demonstrate that this prediction should not be significantly altered by the postulated dipole haloes of other planets due to the rather small region in which each planet's gravity dominates over that of the Sun. The orbit of Saturn should similarly be little affected by a possible ninth planet in the outer Solar System and by the Galactic gravity causing a non-spherical distribution of gravitational dipoles several kAU from the Sun. 

Radio tracking of the Cassini spacecraft orbiting Saturn yields a 5σ upper limit of 160 metres on deviations from its conventionally calculated trajectory. These measurements imply a much more stringent upper limit on α than the minimum required for consistency with rotation curve data. Therefore, no value of α can simultaneously match all available constraints, falsifying the gravitational dipole theory in its current form at extremely high significance.

Indranil Banik, Pavel Kroupa "Solar System limits on gravitational dipoles" arXiv (June 10, 2020) (Accepted for publication by the Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.)