Tuesday, January 23, 2024

Which Came First? Canals Or Cities

Irrigation canals arose so long before cities did that these canals and the agriculture that they are a testament to, couldn't have been the reason that cities came to be. So, maybe religion and not agriculture is the key factor.

The latest data from Ancient Mesopotamian city of Girsu shows that agriculture built around system of irrigation canals existed for a 1000 years before the first city was built.

From the Old European Culture blog

The excerpt below is from the body text of the linked article (an educated layman's level publication, not a scientific journal):

Rey and his team used new technologies to understand the development of the city, flying drones over the vast, 250-hectare site. The images they gathered show the extent to which the irrigation system was embedded throughout the city and its surrounds.

Heavy rainfall, a product of climate change, also washed away the top layer of the soil, making the outlines even more apparent. 
Working with archaeologists from five universities in Iraq, led by Jaafar Jotheri of Al Qadisiyah, the British Museum team dug out shells and other material from the bottom level of the canals to be carbon-dated. The results were startling: the canals seem to have been dug in the fifth millennium BC. .

“The big surprise is that the largest irrigation canals date to the prehistory of Mesopotamia. That means they are much, much older than the birth of the city, by about 1,000 years," says Rey. "Traditionally, what you read is that development in Mesopotamia begins at the end of the fourth millennium, around 3300 BC. That’s when there was an important transition from pre-urban to urban and the invention of writing.

"But the canals that we have dated recently sets the date back to the fifth millennium, which means that irrigation is not the key, the spark that triggered the urban construction and the invention of writing. And that's a really important discovery.”

Before, archeologists believed that once the ancient Sumerians learnt to irrigate their crops, they were able to move from subsistence farming to the social and religious hierarchy that the elaborate temples of Girsu attest to.

But the Girsu Project’s discoveries, which Rey has written up for a paper that has passed peer review but which is still to be published, show that the Sumerians were living with well-watered plains for a full millennium before they began to build the temple complexes.

What changed? What moved the needle towards a more complex society?

Rey speculates that the shift was unrelated to the environment but rather owed to the pattern of thinking of those living in Girsu: an ideological transformation. Temples and administrative buildings allowed the powers ascribed to the gods to reside in one site, which was embedded into a larger social and political structure.

“It was a domestication of the power of the gods,” Rey says, in an adaptation of the phrase usually used for Sumerian development of the domestication of water.

3 comments:

DDeden said...

Canals provide secure decentralized power, temples provide secure centralized power cf Jerusalem, long term recordkeeping marks became script, regional laws controlling anonymous social relationships largely replaced local customs over time. Cities always followed secure cropping. Large canal networks & underground tunnels were sponsored, earlier small canals were local farmer built. Older syaduof swing-bucket moved water from stream to canal, later large river waterwheels (noria) ground grains.

neo said...



arXiv:2401.10202 [pdf, other] astro-ph.CO astro-ph.GA

SPARC galaxies prefer Dark Matter over MOND

Authors: Mariia Khelashvili, Anton Rudakovskyi, Sabine Hossenfelder

Abstract: We currently have two different hypotheses to solve the missing mass problem: dark matter (DM) and modified Newtonian dynamics (MOND). In this work, we use Bayesian inference applied to the Spitzer Photometry and Accurate Rotation Curves (SPARC) galaxies' rotation curves to see which hypothesis fares better. For this, we represent DM by two widely used cusped and cored profiles, Navarro-Frenk-White (NFW) and Burkert. We parameterize MOND by a widely used radial-acceleration relation (RAR). Our results show a preference for the cored DM profile with high Bayes factors in a substantial fraction of galaxies. Interestingly enough, MOND is typically preferred by those galaxies which lack precise rotation curve data. Our study also confirms that the choice of prior has a significant impact on the credible interval of the characteristic MOND acceleration. Overall, our analysis comes out in favor of dark matter. △ Less

Submitted 18 January, 2024; originally announced January 2024.

Comments: 10 pages, 7 figures


arXiv:2401.11534 [pdf, other] astro-ph.GA

Comparing dark matter and MOND hyphotheses from the distribution function of A, F, early-G stars in the solar neighbourhood

Authors: M. A. Syaifudin, M. I. Arifyanto, H. R. T. Wulandari, F. A. M. Mulki

Abstract: Dark matter is hypothetical matter believed to address the missing mass problem in galaxies. However, alternative theories, such as Modified Newtonian Dynamics (MOND), have been notably successful in explaining the missing mass problem in various astrophysical systems. The vertical distribution function of stars in the solar neighbourhood serves as a proxy to constrain galactic dynamics in accordance to its contents. We employ both the vertical positional and velocity distribution of stars in cylindrical coordinates with a radius of 150 pc and a half-height of 200 pc from the galactic plane. Our tracers consist of main-sequence A, F, and early-G stars from the GAIA, RAVE, APOGEE, GALAH, and LAMOST catalogues. We attempt to solve the missing mass in the solar neighbourhood, interpreting it as either dark matter or MOND. Subsequently, we compare both hypotheses newtonian gravity with dark matter and MOND, using the Bayes factor (BF) to determine which one is more favoured by the data. We found that the inferred dark matter in the solar neighbourhood is in range of ∼(0.01-0.07) M⊙ pc−3. We also determine that the MOND hypothesis's acceleration parameter a0 is (1.26±0.13)×10−10 m s−2 for simple interpolating function. The average of bayes factor for all tracers between the two hypotheses is logBF∼0.1, meaning no strong evidence in favour of either the dark matter or MOND hypotheses. △ Less

Submitted 21 January, 2024; originally announced January 2024.

andrew said...

@neo

Thanks for the heads up. I'll look at these papers when I get a chance.