Wednesday, March 10, 2021

Primordial Dark Hole Dark Matter Largely Ruled Out

Proposals for large dim objects such as brown dwarfs which are very dim from a detectable radiation perspective (called MACHOs), or dust or interstellar gas, made of ordinary matter, were ruled out as dark matter candidates long ago. So were ordinary neutrinos (called "hot dark matter").

There are some "out there" proposals that exotic electromagnetically neutral hadrons made of ordinary matter bound by the strong force (e.g. hexaquarks) could serve as dark matter if they were stable. But the strong circumstantial evidence that such hadrons are not stable (e.g., even a really heavy one would have a mass of less than 30 GeV or so and no evidence of stable heavy hadrons have been seen at the 14 TeV of the LHC),, and the lack of evidence of interactions with ordinary matter via the weak force in direct detection experiments also strongly disfavors this class of proposals at masses up to hundreds of GeVs.

Primordial black holes are the last significant proposal for dark matter particle candidates not requiring either particles beyond the Standard Model or gravitational effects beyond Newtonian gravity in the weak field (which is conventionally as a practical matter used to approximate weak field General Relativity in galaxy and galactic cluster and smaller scale cosmology settings by warm and cold dark matter cosmology theorists) to exist.

Small primordial black holes can be ruled out as dark matter candidates because they would decay due to Hawking Radiation too quickly for enough of them to survive to this point from the Big Bang to the current age of the Universe.

Large primordial black holes are ruled out by micro-lensing data and other means.

There is a window between those two constraints for asteroid sized primordial black holes to constitute dark matter, but the paper whose abstract appears below purports (convincingly) to close that gap.
The nature of dark matter (DM) is unknown. 
One compelling possibility is DM being composed of primordial black holes (PBHs), given the tight limits on some types of elementary particles as DM. There is only one remaining window of masses available for PBHs to constitute the entire DM density, 10^17 - 10^23 g. 
Here, we show that the kernel population in the cold Kuiper belt rules out this window, arguing in favor of a particle nature for DM.

Amir Sirajh, Abraham Loeb, "Eliminating the Remaining Window for Primordial Black Holes as Dark Matter from the Dynamics of the Cold Kuiper Belt" arXiv (March 8, 2021). 

To be clear, the paper doesn't rule out the possibility that primordial black holes (i.e. black holes initially formed by means other than the collapse of stars and subsequently by mergers of black holes with each other and by accreting other matter and energy on contact, in the time frame shortly after the Big Bang) exist at all. 

It merely rules out the hypothesis that primordial black holes are the exclusive or predominant part of the solution of explaining dark matter phenomena. Explanations other than that are needed to explain dark matter phenomena which are observed.

The Wikipedia article on Primordial Black Holes, linked above, provides additional recent constraints from the literature that bolster this conclusion:

Depending on the model, primordial black holes could have initial masses ranging from 10^−8 kg (the so-called Planck relics) to more than thousands of solar masses. However, primordial black holes originally having mass lower than 10^11 kg would not have survived to the present due to Hawking radiation, which causes complete evaporation in a time much shorter than the age of the Universe.  
Primordial black holes are non-baryonic and as such are plausible dark matter candidates. Primordial black holes are also good candidates for being the seeds of the supermassive black holes at the center of massive galaxies, as well as of intermediate-mass black holes.

Primordial black holes belong to the class of massive compact halo objects (MACHOs). They are naturally a good dark matter candidate: they are (nearly) collision-less and stable (if sufficiently massive), they have non-relativistic velocities, and they form very early in the history of the Universe (typically less than one second after the Big Bang). Nevertheless, tight limits on their abundance have been set up from various astrophysical and cosmological observations, so that it is now excluded that they contribute significantly to dark matter over most of the plausible mass range.

In March 2016, one month after the announcement of the detection by Advanced LIGO/VIRGO of gravitational waves emitted by the merging of two 30 solar mass black holes (about 6×10^31 kg), three groups of researchers proposed independently that the detected black holes had a primordial origin.[10][11][12][13]
Two of the groups found that the merging rates inferred by LIGO are consistent with a scenario in which all the dark matter is made of primordial black holes, if a non-negligible fraction of them are somehow clustered within halos such as faint dwarf galaxies or globular clusters, as expected by the standard theory of cosmic structure formation. The third group claimed that these merging rates are incompatible with an all-dark-matter scenario and that primordial black holes could only contribute to less than one percent of the total dark matter. The unexpected large mass of the black holes detected by LIGO has strongly revived interest in primordial black holes with masses in the range of 1 to 100 solar masses. It is however still debated whether this range is excluded or not by other observations, such as the absence of micro-lensing of stars, the cosmic microwave background anisotropies, the size of faint dwarf galaxies, and the absence of correlation between X-ray and radio sources towards the galactic center.

In May 2016, Alexander Kashlinsky suggested that the observed spatial correlations in the unresolved gamma-ray and X-ray background radiations could be due to primordial black holes with similar masses, if their abundance is comparable to that of dark matter.

In April 2019, a study was published suggesting this hypothesis may be a dead end. An international team of researchers has put a theory speculated by the late Stephen Hawking to its most rigorous test to date, and their results have ruled out the possibility that primordial black holes smaller than a tenth of a millimeter (7 × 10^22 kg) make up most of dark matter.[15][16]

In August 2019, a study was published opening up the possibility of making up all dark matter with asteroid-mass primordial black holes (3.5 × 10^−17 – 4 × 10^−12 solar masses, or 7.0 × 10^13 – 8 × 10^18 kg).[17]
<10> Bird, S.; Cholis, I. (2016). "Did LIGO Detect Dark Matter?". Physical Review Letters. 116 (20): 201301. arXiv:1603.00464. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.201301
<11> Clesse, S.; Garcia-Bellido, J. (2017). "The clustering of massive Primordial Black Holes as Dark Matter: Measuring their mass distribution with Advanced LIGO". Physics of the Dark Universe. 10 (2016): 142–147. arXiv:1603.05234.  doi:10.1016/j.dark.2016.10.002
<12> Sasaki, M.; Suyama, T.; Tanaki, T. (2016). "Primordial Black Hole Scenario for the Gravitational-Wave Event GW150914". Physical Review Letters. 117(6): 061101. arXiv:1603.08338. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.061101
<14> Kashlinsky, A. (2016). "LIGO gravitational wave detection, primordial black holes and the near-IR cosmic infrared background anisotropies". The Astrophysical Journal. 823 (2): L25. arXiv:1605.04023.  doi:10.3847/2041-8205/823/2/L25.
<15> "Dark matter is not made up of tiny black holes". ScienceDaily. 2 April 2019. Retrieved 27 September 2019.
<16> Niikura, H.; Takada, M.; Yasuda, N.; et al. (2019). "Microlensing constraints on primordial black holes with Subaru/HSC Andromeda observations". Nature Astronomy. 3 (6): 524–534. arXiv:1701.02151.  doi:10.1038/s41550-019-0723-1
<17> Montero-Camacho, Paulo; Fang, Xiao; Vasquez, Gabriel; Silva, Makana; Hirata, Christopher M. (2019-08-23). "Revisiting constraints on asteroid-mass primordial black holes as dark matter candidates". Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics. 2019 (8): 031. arXiv:1906.05950.  doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2019/08/031

The Wikipedia article goes on to note that: 

A variety of observations have been interpreted to place limits on the abundance and mass of primordial black holes: 
* Lifetime, Hawking radiation and gamma-rays: One way to detect primordial black holes, or to constrain their mass and abundance, is by their Hawking radiation. Stephen Hawking theorized in 1974 that large numbers of such smaller primordial black holes might exist in the Milky Way in our galaxy's halo region. All black holes are theorized to emit Hawking radiation at a rate inversely proportional to their mass. Since this emission further decreases their mass, black holes with very small mass would experience runaway evaporation, creating a burst of radiation at the final phase, equivalent to a hydrogen bomb yielding millions of megatons of explosive force.[21] 
A regular black hole (of about 3 solar masses) cannot lose all of its mass within the current age of the universe (they would take about 10^69 years to do so, even without any matter falling in). However, since primordial black holes are not formed by stellar core collapse, they may be of any size. A black hole with a mass of about 10^11 kg would have a lifetime about equal to the age of the universe. If such low-mass black holes were created in sufficient number in the Big Bang, we should be able to observe explosions by some of those that are relatively nearby in our own Milky Way galaxy. NASA's Fermi Gamma-ray Space Telescope satellite, launched in June 2008, was designed in part to search for such evaporating primordial black holes. Fermi data set up the limit that less than one percent of dark matter could be made of primordial black holes with masses up to 10^13 kg. Evaporating primordial black holes would have also had an impact on the Big Bang nucleosynthesis and change the abundances of light elements in the Universe. However, if theoretical Hawking radiation does not actually exist, such primordial black holes would be extremely difficult, if not impossible, to detect in space due to their small size and lack of large gravitational influence.

* Lensing of gamma-ray bursts: Compact objects can induce a change in the luminosity of gamma-ray bursts when passing close to their line-of-sight, through the gravitational lensing effect. The Fermi Gamma-Ray Burst Monitor experiment found that primordial black holes cannot contribute importantly to the dark matter within the mass range 5 x 10^14 – 10^17 kg.[22] A re-analysis, however, has removed this limit after properly taking into account the extended nature of the source as well as wave optics effects.[23]

* Capture of primordial black holes by neutron stars: If primordial black holes with masses between 10^15 kg and 10^22 kg had abundances comparable to that of dark matter, neutron stars in globular clusters should have captured some of them, leading to the rapid destruction of the star.[24] The observation of neutron stars in globular clusters can thus be used to set a limit on primordial black hole abundance. However, a detailed study of the capture dynamics has challenged this limit and led to its removal.[17]

* Survival of white dwarfs: If a primordial black hole passes through a C/O white dwarf, it may ignite the carbon and subsequently produce a runaway explosion. The observed white dwarf mass distribution can thus provide a limit on primordial black hole abundance. Primordial black holes in the range of ~10^16 – 10^17 kg have been ruled out for being a dominant constituent of the local dark matter density. Furthermore, the runaway explosion may be seen as a Type Ia supernova. Primordial black holes in the mass range 10^17–10^19  kg are limited by the observed supernova rate, though these bounds are subject to astrophysical uncertainties.[25] A detailed study with hydrodynamic simulations have challenged these limits and led to the re-opening of these mass ranges.[17]

* Micro-lensing of stars: If a primordial black hole passes between us and a distant star, it induces a magnification of these stars due to the gravitational lensing effect. By monitoring the magnitude of stars in the Magellanic Clouds, the EROS and MACHO surveys have put a limit on the abundance of primordial black holes in the range 10^23 – 10^31 kg. By observing stars in the Andromeda Galaxy (M31), the Subaru/HSC have put a limit on the abundance of primordial black holes in the range 10^19 - 10^24 kg. According to these surveys, primordial black holes within this range cannot constitute an important fraction of the dark matter.[26][27][16] However, these limits are model-dependent. It has been also argued that if primordial black holes are regrouped in dense halos, the micro-lensing constraints are then naturally evaded.[11] The micro-lensing technique suffers from the finite-size source effect and the diffraction when probing primordial black holes with smaller masses. Scaling laws were derived to demonstrate that the optical micro-lensing is unlikely to limit the abundance of primordial black holes with masses below ~10^18 kg in a foreseeable future.[17]

* Micro-lensing of Ia supernovae: Primordial black holes with masses larger than 10^28 kg would magnify distant type Ia supernova (or any other standard candle of known luminosity) due to gravitational lensing. These effects would be apparent if primordial black holes were a significant contribution to the dark matter density, which is constrained by current data sets.[28][29]

* Temperature anisotropies in the cosmic microwave background: Accretion of matter onto primordial black holes in the early Universe should lead to energy injection in the medium that affects the recombination history of the Universe. This effect induces signatures in the statistical distribution of the cosmic microwave background (CMB) anisotropies. The Planck observations of the CMB exclude that primordial black holes with masses in the range 100 – 10^4 solar masses contribute importantly to the dark matter,[30] at least in the simplest conservative model. It is still debated whether the constraints are stronger or weaker in more realistic or complex scenarios. 
* Gamma-ray signatures from annihilating dark matter: If the dark matter in the Universe is in the form of weakly interacting massive particles or WIMPs, primordial black holes would accrete a halo of WIMPs around them in the early universe.[31] The annihilation of WIMPs in the halo leads to a signal in the gamma-ray spectrum which is potentially detectable by dedicated instruments such as the Fermi Gamma-ray Space Telescope.[32]

At the time of the detection by LIGO of the gravitational waves emitted during the final coalescence of two 30 solar mass black holes, the mass range between 10 and 100 solar masses was still only poorly constrained. Since then, new observations have been claimed to close this window, at least for models in which the primordial black holes have all the same mass: 
* from the absence of X-ray and optical correlations in point sources observed in the direction of the galactic center.[33] 
* from the dynamical heating of dwarf galaxies[34] 
* from the observation of a central star cluster in the Eridanus II dwarf galaxy (but these constraints can be relaxed if Eridanus II owns a central intermediate mass black hole, which is suggested by some observations).[35] If primordial black holes exhibit a broad mass distribution, those constraints could nevertheless still be evaded. 
* from the gravitational micro-lensing of distant quasars by closer galaxies, allowing only 20% of the galactic matter to be in the form of compact objects with stellar masses, a value consistent with the expected stellar population.[36] 
* from micro-lensing of distant stars by galaxy clusters, suggesting that the fraction of dark matter in the form of primordial black holes with masses comparable to those found by LIGO must be less than 10%.[37]
Another hypothesis related to Primordial Black Holes would not ncessarily be ruled out:
In September 2019, a report by James Unwin and Jakub Scholtz proposed the possibility of a primordial black hole (PBH) with mass 5–15 M⊕, about the diameter of a tennis ball, existing in the extended Kuiper Belt to explain the orbital anomalies that are theorized to be the result of a 9th planet in the solar system.


neo said...

have you seen this ?

Factoring in gravitomagnetism could do away with dark matter
Models of galactic rotation curves built of a general relativistic framework could use gravitomagnetism to explain the effects of dark matter

Current assessments of galactic rotation curves are based upon a framework of Newtonian accounts of gravity, a new paper published in EPJ C, by Gerson Otto Ludwig, National Institute for Space Research, Brazil, suggests that if this is substituted with a general relativity-based model, the need to recourse to dark matter is relieved, replaced by the effects of gravitomagnetism.

his is because of an effect in general relativity not present in Newton's theory of gravity -- frame-dragging or the Lense Thirring effect. This effect arises when a massive rotating object like a star or black hole 'drags' the very fabric of spacetime along with it, in turn giving rise to a gravitomagnetic field.

In this paper, Ludwig presents a new model for the rotational curves of galaxies which is in agreement with previous efforts involving general relativity. The researcher demonstrates that even though the effects of gravitomagnetic fields are weak, factoring them into models alleviates the difference between theories of gravity and observed rotational curves -- eliminating the need for dark matter. The theory still needs some development before it is widely accepted, with the author particularly pointing out that the time evolution of galaxies modelled with this framework is a complex problem that will require much deeper analysis.

Ludwig concludes by suggesting that all calculations performed with thin galactic disk models performed up until this point may have to be recalculated, and the very concept of dark matter itself, questioned.

Galactic rotation curve and dark matter according to gravitomagnetism

G. O. Ludwig

The European Physical Journal C volume 81, Article number: 186 (2021)

neo said...

Black Hole Remnants
Ali H. Chamseddine, Viatcheslav Mukhanov, Tobias B. Russ

We show that in asymptotically free mimetic gravity with limiting curvature the black hole singularity can be resolved and replaced by a static patch of de Sitter space. As a result of Hawking evaporation of these non-singular black holes, there remain stable remnants with vanishing Hawking temperature.

Comments: 4 pages
Subjects: High Energy Physics - Theory (hep-th); Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics (astro-ph.CO); General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology (gr-qc)
Journal reference: JHEP (2019) 104
DOI: 10.1007/JHEP10(2019)104
Cite as: arXiv:1908.03498 [hep-th]

andrew said...

@neo The first paper deserves a closer look. Good catch. Thanks.

The second one is something of a snoozer.

neo said...


the second one, black hole remnants as dark matter, so maybe there were primordial black holes the mass of a planck - 50 mg or so, that decayed via hawking radiation to this inert black hole remnants - could explain the third peak of CMB and no modification of the standard model.

id like to see you create a new blog post on this.

neo said...

gravitomagnetism could do away with dark matter might make you forget Deur as it was directly tested by gravity probe b

jd said...

The Ludwig paper is getting attention. It smells correct to me. Deur's work may be just another, equally valid, way to get to the same answers. Probably can say the same thing about any GR approach. So no dark matter in galaxies. Lots of wasted careers.